What home insurance companies can be checked on
Complaint index, financial strength, admitted status.
A question with no leaderboard in it
Eligibility decides more of this than quality does, and no list knows whether a company will write your roof, your claims record or your street. Five checks work on whoever does quote you.
Nobody can rank this product for a stranger. A company decides whether it will write your construction, your roof age and your claims record before price comes up, and a national ranking knows none of that about your house.
A ranking is a formula plus a roster: weights somebody chose, applied to companies whose data somebody could obtain. Neither half contains your address.
Three inputs, weighted by whoever published the list: a solvency opinion bought from a rating agency, a complaint measure taken from state filings, and a price quoted for one invented house with an invented roof and credit tier. That last input travels worst — yours was never in the run.
Five checks survive that. Each runs on whoever does quote you; the table sets out their limits.
| Check | What it tests | Where the answer is kept | What it cannot tell you |
|---|---|---|---|
| One. Breadth of the form | Whether the contract answers the cause at all, and on which valuation. | Your declarations page, then the form edition named on it. | Whether this insurer will write your house at the figure quoted. |
| Two. The filing record | Which standard the rate was approved against, and on whose clock. | The rate filing, a public record in most states. | That a high rate is unlawful. Loss experience can support it. |
| Three. Financial strength | Whether the company can pay what it owes in a bad year. | The rating agency’s published opinion on that company. | How a claim is adjusted, how long it takes, or who is eligible. |
| Four. Admitted or surplus | Which regulator holds the rate and the form behind the quote. | Your state insurance department’s list of admitted insurers. | What the difference changes there. That is set state by state. |
| Five. Roof settlement | Whether the roof is paid new for old, and for which perils. | The loss settlement section and any roof endorsement on it. | What the roof is worth on the day. Depreciation is figured then. |
Breadth differs on paper before anyone prices anything. In the standard special form, which the NAIC put at close to 79 percent of owner-occupied exposures on 2023 data published in July 2026, the house and the detached structures are open-peril: direct physical loss, minus what the form subtracts. Personal property is not. It sits on a closed list of sixteen named causes, so a cause that damages the wall and gets paid can damage the sofa in front of it and not.
The comprehensive form moves contents onto the same footing, and on that 2023 data it carried about one owner-occupied policy in eight.
A claim can fail in four places and a declarations page shows two. The peril gate decides whether the policy answers the cause. The exclusions subtract nine named categories, and the wording removes the loss when an excluded cause sits anywhere in the chain rather than at the head of it. The limits decide how much money stands behind a coverage that exists, and some categories of personal property carry caps that never print on that page. The valuation decides new-for-old or depreciated: contents are depreciated in the standard form unless replacement cost was bought as an option.
On an old house the argument moves off the peril list. The modified form, HO-8, exists for a dwelling whose cost to rebuild runs well past what it would sell for. It settles on a repair-cost footing rather than full replacement cost, and the regulators’ own one-line definition of it is limited coverage for older or high-risk homes. It is rare: under half of one percent of owner-occupied exposures on that same 2023 data. The question is which form you were offered, not which company ranks highest.
A rate is not a company decision. It is a company decision that survived a state process, and that process leaves a public paper trail in most states.
The NAIC sorts the states into six filing regimes, entries reviewed in June 2026: prior approval, modified prior approval, flex rating, file and use, use and file, and no filing at all. Under prior approval nobody is charged the rate until the department approves it. Under use and file it is charged first and filed afterward. The standard applied is narrow — adequate, not excessive, based on sound actuarial principles — so a high rate that loss experience supports is a lawful one.
Where a department publishes a complaint record, read the denominator first. An index of that kind is a ratio, complaints measured against the company’s share of the market, so size alone neither condemns nor flatters. A ratio built on a handful of files moves on noise. Read the count beside the index.
Paying claims is what a reader most wants ranked and the least visible from outside. Two records answer it, and neither is a score. One is the complaint file the state keeps. The other is the contract: what gets paid on a roof, on contents, on a partial loss is settled in the loss settlement section before an adjuster is assigned.
A financial strength rating is an opinion about solvency: whether the company can pay what it owes when a bad year arrives. That is the only question it answers. It does not describe how a claim is adjusted, how long the money takes, or whether held-back depreciation comes back — nor whether the company will write your house at all.
Change the weights a publisher chose and the order changes. A company missing from the data set cannot place at all, however well it writes your street.
The filing machinery above applies to companies admitted in your state: the state holds the rate and the form, and the department that reviewed them will answer questions about them. Which companies those are is a state roster, and the home insurance by state table behind that question sets out what each one files and what it deducts for a storm.
Where the admitted market declines a house, the surplus lines market takes what it declined. Establish which side a quote came from, then ask your state insurance department what that changes there. The answer is set state by state, not by us.
The roof is where a replacement-cost policy quietly stops being one. The NAIC’s 2026 homeowners data call has insurers report how many policies in force settle the roof at replacement cost and how many at actual cash value, and a policy sold as replacement cost that depreciates one peril is reported as actual cash value. The regulators’ own example is wind and hail damage to a roof. The same data call counts policies that exclude cosmetic damage: dents that change how a roof looks and not what it does.
Wind and hail is also the pair a servicer has in mind when it checks the structure is insured, which is why what a lender calls hazard insurance and what settles your roof are different questions.
One endorsement, in an edition dated August 2023, shows the shape. Replacement cost terms are deleted and replaced with actual cash value for wind or hail loss to roof surfacing once that surfacing reaches fifteen years. Surfacing takes in the underlayment and the flashing, not just the shingles. Depreciation applies to labor as well as materials.
One state has written the gate into statute, and it is worth reading even where it does not bind. Under the 2026 Florida statutes an insurer may not refuse to issue or renew a policy solely because the roof is under fifteen years old. At fifteen and over it must let the homeowner pay for an inspection by an approved inspector first, and may not refuse on roof age alone where that inspection finds five or more years of useful life left. The same subsection fixes what roof age means: the last date 100 percent of the surface area was built or replaced to the code then in effect. A patch does not reset it.
Florida wrote a second answer into statute, for Florida only: the 2026 statutes cap a separate roof deductible at the lesser of 2 percent of the dwelling limit or half the cost of replacing the roof. The carve-outs matter as much as the cap. It applies only on a replacement cost adjustment, and never to a total loss, a hurricane loss, an object through the deck, or a repair covering less than half the roof. None of that travels: read homeowners insurance in Florida and its roof rules for the state that has them. Elsewhere it is three questions asked out loud — the settlement basis, whether it changes by peril, whether cosmetic damage is excluded.
Complaint index, financial strength, admitted status.
Six fields, in the order that matters.
Breadth of the form is the first of the five checks.
Price is a check, not the check.
Which side of the licensing line an offer sits on, and what changes with it.
Not as a name. The shorter list is of companies willing to write a roof of that age, and among those the settlement wording varies more than the premium does.
Because each weighs different things and prices a different imaginary house. Two lists from the same public data sort differently when one counts complaints heavily and the other counts price.
A condition in the loss settlement section, not a law. The standard form pays a building loss at replacement cost while the insurance is at least eighty percent of rebuilding cost; below that it pays the greater of actual cash value or a proportional share. Some insurers write it at a hundred percent, and it bites on ordinary partial losses.
As many as will write the house, which on a difficult roof may be two. The count matters less than the setup: three figures built on three different dwelling limits and three different deductibles compare nothing.
Only when the lines match: same dwelling limit, same deductible including any separate wind or roof deductible, same valuation on contents and on the roof.
The question is usually aimed at the wrong body. What most homeowners answer to is the mortgage: federal servicing rules define hazard insurance as insurance on the property that the owner of the loan requires. A house with no loan on it has nobody asking.
Which companies are admitted there, and what standard a filed rate was approved against. A dispute about a claim or a bill goes to the company that issued the policy.
Sources and data years
Page last reviewed 2026-09-23. Each figure above carries the year of its own data.